Probably! Lol Without their anti-crypto and blockchain stance, they'd become irrelevant and soon fade into the past. I was gracious enough to compare them to Thomas Edison and Henry Ford. Haha
I'm so glad you stood strong and held your ground against these self-proclaimed experts, Jenny. I saw the tweet (https://x.com/JDonoghueAuthor/status/1836467677604495668) from Jake confirming your stance against @AmScream, showing that you were indeed invited to the table, at least offered the mic. @AmScream gaslighted simple messages, yet we are supposed to trust his words about blockchain and crypto? He should stay in his own bubble.
"Apologies if there’s any misunderstanding here but no aspect of the above was intended to imply Adam is in any way incompetent? He is remarkably erudite, and has a comprehensive understanding of all the technical aspects of crypto and why it fails to provide any real-world value or utility. He’s done a great deal to spread awareness of the pernicious aspects of crypto and how it extracts value from ordinary investors who get lured into it. I am all for a full and frank exchange of views but pls keep things civil @JennyQTa7
otherwise I won’t engage"
So what we have here is a consistent, pathological record of Jenny saying one thing, and people saying, "That's not what was said!"
Dude, he's your buddy, so it's totally biased. You used those useless awards for your documentary to prove your outdated theories about cryptocurrencies. You are one huge joke!
Note that Jenny felt like she was shafted in this online chat.
The truth is she tried to exploit the panel to promote her shitcoin.
That was not the proper forum for that. Now she's butthurt and bitching into the ether about it.
And engaged in passive-aggressive attacks against someone she blocked on Twitter and won't communicate with. Someone who extended her an invitation to go live in front of everybody and debate who's right and who's wrong?
All you Jenny fans out there... why wouldn't you support her going live with American Scream and "schooling" him like she claims? He's extended the invitation. She's chickened out - instead opting to bitch and moan on her private substack where she can control the narrative.
It seems if there's something to be settled, it should be done in neural territory, like a live chat where both parties can record the event and there's no manipulation over who-said-what.
But, it seems, crypto people can only debate in little controlled "safe spaces" apparently.
She was silenced by a group of boomers who didn’t let her speak. She exposes worthless projects, as shown in the many articles she’s already written on her Substack, so stop pretending otherwise. It’s great she stood up to a group of out-of-touch individuals trying to stay relevant, despite knowing nothing about blockchain or cryptocurrencies. You're just trying to sell books and documentaries, which are meaningless coming from people without the credentials to back up what they’re saying.
Everybody noticed you deleted your childish, insane ramblings on Twitter... but here is American Scream's response... not that you'd give him a fair shake.
"For those interested in how this train wreck started, listen to the most recent ioRadio.org episode where she came on a live Twitter space of critics and then proceeded to self-promote herself and her crypto memecoin -- to a panel of people who basically believe the entire industry is nothing but fraud.
Talk about NOT READING THE ROOM.... and complete lack of self-awareness.
Once she started making claims that "crypto/blockchain has gone mainstream" and is being used everywhere, I exposed her various name-dropping claims as being lies.
She obviously didn't like that and decided to write a hit piece on me...
Even before she launched an insane tirade of petty personal insults at me, I extended her an invitation to debate me live and back up her claims. She refused, all the while proclaiming her intellectual superiority, but being unwilling to prove it in an open forum.
Anyway, I'm used to this. Most crypto shills end up hiding behind ad hominem distractions as opposed to credible evidence and citations.
For those wondering whether her claim that "IBM is using blockchain" is legit, no it's not. Their main, principal blockchain project that was hyped by crypto bros -- still to this day, was a prominent partnership with shipping company Maersk.. While the web page promoting the venture still sits online and is cited every day as a "crypto success story" in reality it was cancelled. See https://t.co/gFOgYfjU4N
Other so-called "blockchain" projects, such as IBM's "hyperledger" are not actually blockchain - IBM has just borrowed that name and registered their own trademark: "IBM Blockchain®"
When you examine what IBM calls "blockchain" it looks nothing like crypto's version.. IBM's version is centralized; it's not permissionless; it's not public, and there's no evidence it's "immutable" in the same manner as crypto blockchain. It's just a marketing ploy to take advantage of the crypto/blockchain fad.
But more importantly, there's insufficient evidence that any mission-critical apps are using the tech. There's lots of name-dropping but nothing indicating this is anything more than prototypical.
The reason for this is because we know, by design blockchain is an inferior database system, hamstrung from its birth, abandoned decades ago by real engineers.
Nonetheless, I try to always be open to having my mind changed, and willing to debate those who disagree.
Unfortunately it seems pro-crypto people are incapable of arguing in good faith. I will continue to extend an invitation just in case one of them wants to try to prove otherwise.
If you think crypto & blockchain has some unique value and want to discuss it and you're not a malignant narcissist hyping a memecoin Ponzi scheme, feel free to reach out."
Hey liar! She screenshotted all of her tweets—and yours—for exclusive use on her Substack. That’s intellectual marketing 101. That’s why you're here yapping on her Substack instead of Twitter. Grow a brain and get some real credentials!
AMScream's response to your post was made on Twitter. It says:
"IBM's "Hyperledger" is NOTHING like crypto blockchains. In fact, IBM trademarked their own term: "IBM Blockchain®" - their version of "blockchain" is neither decentralized, nor permissionless and doesn't use PoW/PoS. It does not in any way resemble a crypto blockchain."
"Now I admit, I'm a software engineer, so I can telll the difference between what actually IS a blockchain, and someone just using the word "blockchain" to exploit the il-informed and uneducated - I understand you probably aren't capable of making those distinctions."
"By the way, in your substack you expected to be able to give a bunch of critics an "elevator pitch" when you were there to ASK A QUESTION. It became obvious after 3 minutes you were only there to shill your shitcoin, and I (rightly) shut-you-down"
Your exchange is almost exclusively filled with childish name-calling. It's hardly professional or authoritative. Looks like he got under your skin in a big way.
We loved how she called out arrogant, self-promoting, credential-less people like you. You got a taste of your own medicine—murdered by a woman. Just like Kamala murdered Trump on the debate stage, Jenny murdered you! HAHA
Bro, even your own buddy called you out for being a lying, manipulative fool. Jake confirmed he did invite her to the table and gave her the mic. With so many lies and no credentials, who died and gave you the throne to call out blockchain and crypto?
Jenny was absolutely right to call you all those names because payback’s a bitch when you're on the receiving end, just like you did to her on Spaces. Man up with them balls!
Go back and read that tweet - it's not there.. Jake deleted it because Jenny misinterpreted what was meant, and he didn't want to get dragged into her nasty, mean-spirited personal attacks.
"Apologies if there’s any misunderstanding here but no aspect of the above was intended to imply Adam is in any way incompetent? He is remarkably erudite, and has a comprehensive understanding of all the technical aspects of crypto and why it fails to provide any real-world value or utility. He’s done a great deal to spread awareness of the pernicious aspects of crypto and how it extracts value from ordinary investors who get lured into it. I am all for a full and frank exchange of views but pls keep things civil @JennyQTa7 otherwise I won’t engage"
What we have here is a bunch of "he-said, she-said" bullshit.
If Jenny really wanted to "set the record straight" she could have a real time debate. She's too chickenshit to do that. She'd rather post crap on her substack where you little minions can massage her shoulders and tell her how awesome she is, without actually fielding any tough questions.
Dude, Jenny was the one who called you incompetent, and it's been proven that you're a liar who knows nothing about blockchain. Jenny nailed your balls to the wall on Twitter, so why would she waste any more time boosting your YouTube channel with no subscribers? She's smart. Your sidekick Jake giving you a compliment is like two con men patting each other on the back—empty and meaningless.
I would encourage people to view your insane ramblings on Twitter, rather than the sanitized version you've provided here. AmericanScream shut you down for promoting your shitcoin and making false claims and you have not proven your claims were true.
Dude, why hide behind a new name when you're @AmScream himself? Jenny already debunked your IBM fake news. She probably knew you'd lie, so she smartly took a full video screenshot of all your and her tweets. You're a joke, man! Get some real credentials before proclaiming you're an expert.
He'll still lie even with all the tweets right there. He's calling out blockchain and crypto for having no real-world value, coming from a man with no real-world credentials. 😂
Excellent comeback! Nice Jenny!
His X profile says he's a Reddit moderator. That alone speaks volumes about his "expertise" and the fact that these guys actually rely on him.
Right?!? Lol
I like the image of the old men depicting these guys are simply boomers and outdated.
I'm glad you caught that! Lol
Jake thought he laid a trap for you, but it backfired spectacularly.
Weak! I hope his book is selling well. Honestly, I wouldn't buy it.
Too good! "Maybe they're all just taking the bus around?!" LMAO
Probably! Lol Without their anti-crypto and blockchain stance, they'd become irrelevant and soon fade into the past. I was gracious enough to compare them to Thomas Edison and Henry Ford. Haha
I believe you're right about Kamala. Al Gore during Bill Clinton's presidency was behind the booming of the internet.
I'm so glad you stood strong and held your ground against these self-proclaimed experts, Jenny. I saw the tweet (https://x.com/JDonoghueAuthor/status/1836467677604495668) from Jake confirming your stance against @AmScream, showing that you were indeed invited to the table, at least offered the mic. @AmScream gaslighted simple messages, yet we are supposed to trust his words about blockchain and crypto? He should stay in his own bubble.
She nailed his lying tiny balls to the fuq'ing wall!! 😂
Actually, Jake did not agree with Jenny's spin. He responded:
https://x.com/JDonoghueAuthor/status/1836467677604495668
"Apologies if there’s any misunderstanding here but no aspect of the above was intended to imply Adam is in any way incompetent? He is remarkably erudite, and has a comprehensive understanding of all the technical aspects of crypto and why it fails to provide any real-world value or utility. He’s done a great deal to spread awareness of the pernicious aspects of crypto and how it extracts value from ordinary investors who get lured into it. I am all for a full and frank exchange of views but pls keep things civil @JennyQTa7
otherwise I won’t engage"
So what we have here is a consistent, pathological record of Jenny saying one thing, and people saying, "That's not what was said!"
Pretty sad.
Dude, he's your buddy, so it's totally biased. You used those useless awards for your documentary to prove your outdated theories about cryptocurrencies. You are one huge joke!
I love this, taking a positive stand always results to Joy
Kamala Harris is on point!
Note that Jenny felt like she was shafted in this online chat.
The truth is she tried to exploit the panel to promote her shitcoin.
That was not the proper forum for that. Now she's butthurt and bitching into the ether about it.
And engaged in passive-aggressive attacks against someone she blocked on Twitter and won't communicate with. Someone who extended her an invitation to go live in front of everybody and debate who's right and who's wrong?
All you Jenny fans out there... why wouldn't you support her going live with American Scream and "schooling" him like she claims? He's extended the invitation. She's chickened out - instead opting to bitch and moan on her private substack where she can control the narrative.
It seems if there's something to be settled, it should be done in neural territory, like a live chat where both parties can record the event and there's no manipulation over who-said-what.
But, it seems, crypto people can only debate in little controlled "safe spaces" apparently.
She was silenced by a group of boomers who didn’t let her speak. She exposes worthless projects, as shown in the many articles she’s already written on her Substack, so stop pretending otherwise. It’s great she stood up to a group of out-of-touch individuals trying to stay relevant, despite knowing nothing about blockchain or cryptocurrencies. You're just trying to sell books and documentaries, which are meaningless coming from people without the credentials to back up what they’re saying.
Everybody noticed you deleted your childish, insane ramblings on Twitter... but here is American Scream's response... not that you'd give him a fair shake.
https://x.com/AmScream/status/1836409169668133260
Here's what it said:
"For those interested in how this train wreck started, listen to the most recent ioRadio.org episode where she came on a live Twitter space of critics and then proceeded to self-promote herself and her crypto memecoin -- to a panel of people who basically believe the entire industry is nothing but fraud.
Talk about NOT READING THE ROOM.... and complete lack of self-awareness.
Once she started making claims that "crypto/blockchain has gone mainstream" and is being used everywhere, I exposed her various name-dropping claims as being lies.
She obviously didn't like that and decided to write a hit piece on me...
Even before she launched an insane tirade of petty personal insults at me, I extended her an invitation to debate me live and back up her claims. She refused, all the while proclaiming her intellectual superiority, but being unwilling to prove it in an open forum.
Anyway, I'm used to this. Most crypto shills end up hiding behind ad hominem distractions as opposed to credible evidence and citations.
For those wondering whether her claim that "IBM is using blockchain" is legit, no it's not. Their main, principal blockchain project that was hyped by crypto bros -- still to this day, was a prominent partnership with shipping company Maersk.. While the web page promoting the venture still sits online and is cited every day as a "crypto success story" in reality it was cancelled. See https://t.co/gFOgYfjU4N
Other so-called "blockchain" projects, such as IBM's "hyperledger" are not actually blockchain - IBM has just borrowed that name and registered their own trademark: "IBM Blockchain®"
When you examine what IBM calls "blockchain" it looks nothing like crypto's version.. IBM's version is centralized; it's not permissionless; it's not public, and there's no evidence it's "immutable" in the same manner as crypto blockchain. It's just a marketing ploy to take advantage of the crypto/blockchain fad.
But more importantly, there's insufficient evidence that any mission-critical apps are using the tech. There's lots of name-dropping but nothing indicating this is anything more than prototypical.
The reason for this is because we know, by design blockchain is an inferior database system, hamstrung from its birth, abandoned decades ago by real engineers.
I prove this in my documentary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tspGVbmMmVA
Nonetheless, I try to always be open to having my mind changed, and willing to debate those who disagree.
Unfortunately it seems pro-crypto people are incapable of arguing in good faith. I will continue to extend an invitation just in case one of them wants to try to prove otherwise.
If you think crypto & blockchain has some unique value and want to discuss it and you're not a malignant narcissist hyping a memecoin Ponzi scheme, feel free to reach out."
Hey liar! She screenshotted all of her tweets—and yours—for exclusive use on her Substack. That’s intellectual marketing 101. That’s why you're here yapping on her Substack instead of Twitter. Grow a brain and get some real credentials!
AMScream's response to your post was made on Twitter. It says:
"IBM's "Hyperledger" is NOTHING like crypto blockchains. In fact, IBM trademarked their own term: "IBM Blockchain®" - their version of "blockchain" is neither decentralized, nor permissionless and doesn't use PoW/PoS. It does not in any way resemble a crypto blockchain."
"Now I admit, I'm a software engineer, so I can telll the difference between what actually IS a blockchain, and someone just using the word "blockchain" to exploit the il-informed and uneducated - I understand you probably aren't capable of making those distinctions."
"By the way, in your substack you expected to be able to give a bunch of critics an "elevator pitch" when you were there to ASK A QUESTION. It became obvious after 3 minutes you were only there to shill your shitcoin, and I (rightly) shut-you-down"
See the whole thread here: https://x.com/JennyQTa7/status/1836164424824164852
Your exchange is almost exclusively filled with childish name-calling. It's hardly professional or authoritative. Looks like he got under your skin in a big way.
We loved how she called out arrogant, self-promoting, credential-less people like you. You got a taste of your own medicine—murdered by a woman. Just like Kamala murdered Trump on the debate stage, Jenny murdered you! HAHA
Bro, even your own buddy called you out for being a lying, manipulative fool. Jake confirmed he did invite her to the table and gave her the mic. With so many lies and no credentials, who died and gave you the throne to call out blockchain and crypto?
Jenny was absolutely right to call you all those names because payback’s a bitch when you're on the receiving end, just like you did to her on Spaces. Man up with them balls!
Go back and read that tweet - it's not there.. Jake deleted it because Jenny misinterpreted what was meant, and he didn't want to get dragged into her nasty, mean-spirited personal attacks.
https://x.com/JDonoghueAuthor/status/1836467677604495668
"Apologies if there’s any misunderstanding here but no aspect of the above was intended to imply Adam is in any way incompetent? He is remarkably erudite, and has a comprehensive understanding of all the technical aspects of crypto and why it fails to provide any real-world value or utility. He’s done a great deal to spread awareness of the pernicious aspects of crypto and how it extracts value from ordinary investors who get lured into it. I am all for a full and frank exchange of views but pls keep things civil @JennyQTa7 otherwise I won’t engage"
What we have here is a bunch of "he-said, she-said" bullshit.
If Jenny really wanted to "set the record straight" she could have a real time debate. She's too chickenshit to do that. She'd rather post crap on her substack where you little minions can massage her shoulders and tell her how awesome she is, without actually fielding any tough questions.
Dude, Jenny was the one who called you incompetent, and it's been proven that you're a liar who knows nothing about blockchain. Jenny nailed your balls to the wall on Twitter, so why would she waste any more time boosting your YouTube channel with no subscribers? She's smart. Your sidekick Jake giving you a compliment is like two con men patting each other on the back—empty and meaningless.
I would encourage people to view your insane ramblings on Twitter, rather than the sanitized version you've provided here. AmericanScream shut you down for promoting your shitcoin and making false claims and you have not proven your claims were true.
Dude, why hide behind a new name when you're @AmScream himself? Jenny already debunked your IBM fake news. She probably knew you'd lie, so she smartly took a full video screenshot of all your and her tweets. You're a joke, man! Get some real credentials before proclaiming you're an expert.
He'll still lie even with all the tweets right there. He's calling out blockchain and crypto for having no real-world value, coming from a man with no real-world credentials. 😂